Legal Opinion
Mero v. Sadoff
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1995No. B080747PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
Introduction
Plaintiff Maureen Mero appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Armin Sadoff, M.D.
Statement of Facts
The following facts are undisputed: On November 14, 1989, plaintiff injured her back while at work for Shell Oil Company (Shell). She filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits from Shell. At the time, Shell was self-insured.
In her claim, plaintiff complained of orthopedic injury, including back pain. In the workers’ compensation action, Shell requested that plaintiff submit to an examination by defendant concerning her complaints of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Landeros v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Stratton v. First National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Brown v. KennardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.