Legal Opinion

United States v. Fred Nobriga

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 29, 2006No. 04-10169PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Fred Nobriga appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. The indictment charged him with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9) by possessing a firearm after having been previously convicted of a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence,” as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(A)(ii). We reverse the district court’s denial of Nobriga’s motion to dismiss.

I

Nobriga was indicted in 2003 by a federal grand jury in Hawaii for being a person previously convicted of a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” in possession of a fire-arm. Section 921 (a)(33)(A)(ii) defines that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Pedro Velasco-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. William Maurice SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Voisine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Fernando Malta-Espinoza v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API