United States v. Fred Nobriga
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Fred Nobriga appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. The indictment charged him with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9) by possessing a firearm after having been previously convicted of a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence,” as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(A)(ii). We reverse the district court’s denial of Nobriga’s motion to dismiss.
I
Nobriga was indicted in 2003 by a federal grand jury in Hawaii for being a person previously convicted of a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” in possession of a fire-arm. Section 921 (a)(33)(A)(ii) defines that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Pedro Velasco-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. William Maurice SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Voisine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Fernando Malta-Espinoza v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.