Legal Opinion
Mark H. v. Hamamoto
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 26, 2010No. 09-15754PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Following remand from our court, Mark H. v. Haw. Dep’t of Educ., 513 F.3d 922 (9th Cir.2008), Mark H. and Rie H., individually and as guardians ad litem for their daughters Michelle H. and Natalie H., (collectively “H. Family”) filed an amended complaint against the Hawaii Department of Education (acting through its employees), and Patricia Hamamoto, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Hawaii Department of Education (collectively “Hawaii DOE”). In their amended complaint, the H. Family sought damages for Hawaii DOE’s alleged violations of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Vinson v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Duvall v. County of KitsapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Lance Wood v. Tom BeauclairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Catherine Evon v. Law Offices of Sidney MickellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- A.G. Ex Rel. Grundemann v. Paradise Valley Unified School District No. 69Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- T.B. ex rel. Brenneise v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Tracy Dunlap v. Liberty Natural ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.