Legal Opinion
Vinson v. Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 3, 2002No. 00-15534PublishedCited by 441 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
Brian Vinson (“Vinson”) filed suit against Alice Thomas (“Thomas”) and the State of Hawaii Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (“DLIR”) (collectively “the defendants”) claiming they denied him vocational rehabilitation services in violation of his rights under Title II of the ADA and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Vinson appeals.
Consistent with our recent decision in Douglas v. California Department of Youth Authority, 271 F.3d 812, as amended, 271 F.3d 910 (9th Cir.2001),…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Duvall v. County of KitsapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by441 opinions
- Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Richard McGary v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Miranda B. v. KitzhaberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
436 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.