Legal Opinion
Catherine Evon v. Law Offices of Sidney Mickell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 1, 2012No. 10-16615, 10-17836PublishedCited by 199 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Both parties in this action appeal various rulings of the district court’s summary judgment, class certification, attorney’s fees, and sanctions orders. The principal issue is whether a debt collector may send collection notices addressed to the debtor, in “care of’ the debtor’s employer. We conclude that the answer is “no.”
Defendant Law Offices of Sidney Mickell sent a debt collection letter addressed directly to Plaintiff Catherine Evon in “care of’ her employer. Evon filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Mickell’s act of sending letters “care of’ the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by199 opinions
- Victor Parsons v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Zakia Mashiri v. Epsten Grinnell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- America Unites for Kids v. Sylvia RousseauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- David Tourgeman v. Collins Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- B.K. v. Thomas BetlachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.