Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Bernblum

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

In this action the plaintiff’s sole claim for relief was for the issuance of an injunction restraining the defendant from taking any action to recover upon a policy of insurance, the claim upon which had been assigned to him, and, specifically, to restrain him from further prosecuting an action he had brought upon the policy in the courts of Missouri. The facts material to the issue before us as stated in the finding, with such minor corrections as the plaintiff is entitled to have made, are as follows: The plaintiff is a Connecticut corporation engaged in the insurance business and licensed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Warner v. . JaffrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grassi v. Ciba-Geigy, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Advest, Inc. v. WachtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Grassi v. Ciba-Geigy, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. Wehrhane v. PeytonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Connecticut General Life Insurance v. SVA, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API