Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1934No. 24853. En BancPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

July 10, 1926, plaintiff was working as powder man in a quarry. After a round of shots had been fired, he was engaged in “barring down” rock loosened by the blast, at a point on the side wall of the quarry ninety feet above the floor. While thus engaged, a mass of loosened rock, consisting of several tons, gave way. The avalanche carried plaintiff with it to the floor of the quarry. When dug out of the debris, he was unconscious, and remained so for some hours. He was taken to a hospital, where he remained for two weeks. During the first two or three days, he was in a semi-conscious condition.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hunnewell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Rialto Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Klein v. Len H. Darling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Sykes v. Republic Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Mickelson v. FischerWashington Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hood v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Miller v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Barr v. Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Berndt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Peterson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API