Diamond v. Davis
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
680 A.2d 364 (1996)
Patrick H. DIAMOND, Appellant,
v.
Carle E. DAVIS, et al., Appellees.
No. 93-CV-1246.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued January 4, 1995.
Decided February 20, 1996.
Patrick H. Diamond, pro se.
Paul E. Mirengoff, with whom Robert F. Brooks, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellees.
Before FERREN and RUIZ, Associate Judges, and KERN, Senior Judge.
2Per curiam
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Part II of Judge RUIZ's opinion, the concurring opinion of Judge KERN, and Part I of the opinion of Judge FERREN concurring in the judgment.
3Concurring in part, dissenting in part · RuizRuiz, Associate Judge
This appeal presents the…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Ferren.
4Cases cited64 opinions
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Hobson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,975 Michelle K. Tomera, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Arthur T. Galt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Kilbourn v. SunderlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- A. Ernest Fitzgerald v. Robert C. Seamans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.