Legal Opinion

Michael v. Gates

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1995No. B078695PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

This case presents issues regarding the application of Penal Code section 832.7, Evidence Code section 1043, and the constitutional right to privacy to a novel factual situation. Specifically, we are asked to determine whether, when a former police officer testifies against a police department in a lawsuit, the law enforcement agency which employed the officer may allow its lawyer to review the officer’s personnel records in order to evaluate their use as impeachment at trial, without compliance with the procedural requirements of Evidence Code sections 1043 and 1045. We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Shields v. SingletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. Super. Ct. (Johnson)California Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Raul Gonzalez, Jr. v. Chandra Spencer Franscell, Strickland, Roberts & Lawrence, a Professional Corporation Los Angeles CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Rosales v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY (GREMMINGER)California Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. SUSAN S. v. IsraelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API