Legal Opinion

People v. Super. Ct. (Johnson)

California Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2015No. S221296PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (2002) 29 Cal.4th, 1 [124 Cal.Rptr.2d 202, 52 P.3d 129] (City of Los Angeles)? we considered the interplay between the prosecution’s constitutional duty under Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83 [10 L.Ed.2d 215, 83 S.Ct. 1194] (Brady) and its progeny, and statutory procedures by which the parties can seek discovery of information in confidential peace officer personnel records. We do so again.

Brady, supra, 373 U.S. 83, generally obligates the prosecution to disclose to the defense material evidence favorable to the defendant.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. Pettie, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. People v. McDanielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Ass'n for L.A. Deputy Sheriffs v. Superior Court of L.A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Riske v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API