Legal Opinion

Rosales v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 2000No. B134358PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEISMAN, J. *

We are called upon in this case to decide whether a violation of the statutory procedures governing disclosure of police personnel records gives rise to a private cause of action by the police officer whose records were improperly disclosed. We hold that violation of such procedures does not give rise to a private cause of action and therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment of dismissal of the officer’s action.

Procedural Background

On May 3, 1999, plaintiff and appellant John Rosales (Rosales), a former Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officer, filed this action…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Quiroz v. Seventh Avenue CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Millard v. BIOSOURCES, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Fletcher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API