Geo M. Martin Co. v. Alliance MacHine Systems International LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
Following a trial for patent infringement that resulted in a hung jury, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled as a matter of law that U.S. Patent No. 6,655,566 (the “'566 patent”) would have been obvious at the time of invention. Geo. M. Martin Co. v. Alliance Mach. Sys. Int'l LLC, 634 F.Supp.2d 1024 (2008) (JMOL Opinion). Because the record supports the trial court’s judgment, this court affirms.
I
A “bundle breaker” is a machine used to separate stacked sheets of corrugated board. The '566 patent claims an improvement over the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Old Reliable Wholesale, Inc. v. Cornell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Cheese Systems, Inc. v. Tetra Pak Cheese & Powder Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.