Legal Opinion
Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 26, 2011No. 2010-1183PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge RADER. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
RADER, Chief Judge,
Appellant Star Scientific, Inc. (“Star”) appeals the denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) and in the alternative a new trial after a jury verdict of non-infringement and invalidity of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,202,649 (“'649 patent”) and 6,425,401 (“'401 patent”) (collectively, “Williams patents”). Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. 8:01-cv-1504, Dkt. No. 1146 (D.Md. Dec. 21, 2009). This court affirms the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Samsung Electronics Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Abbott GmbH & Co. v. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Ateliers De La Haute-Garonne v. Broetje Automation Usa Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.