Legal Opinion

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 7, 2016No. 2015-1171, 2015-1195, 2015-1994PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurring in the result without opinion Circuit Judge HUGHES.

Dissenting Opinion filed by Chief Judge PROST.

Dissenting Opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK.

Dissenting Opinion filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

The current appeal results from a patent infringement suit and countersuit between Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). Relevant to this en banc decision, the district court granted summary judgment that Samsung’s accused devices…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  3. Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc. v. the Toro CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  4. Intercontinental Great Brands v. Kellogg North America CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  5. Polara Engineering Inc v. Campbell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API