Legal Opinion
University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 10, 2018No. 2017-1907PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Circuit Judge.
*1289 The University of California, the University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier, (collectively "UC"), appeal a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board determining there was no interference-in-fact between UC's Application No. 13/842,859, and the claims of twelve patents and one application owned by the Broad Institute, Inc., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the President and Fellows of Harvard College, (collectively "Broad"). Because the Board's underlying factual findings are supported by substantial evidence and the Board did not err in concluding…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Wbip, LLC v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Osi Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Apotex Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Celgene Corporation v. PeterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Actavis LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Adapt Pharma Operations v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- University of Strathclyde v. Clear-Vu Lighting LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.