State v. Holmes
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Did the trial judge commit prejudicial error by failing to declare a mistrial on his own motion or in the alternative by failing to instruct the jury to disregard certain remarks made by the district attorney in the presence of the jury? The answer to this question is governed by the followed well recognized rules.
Every person charged with a crime has the right to be tried before an impartial judge and by an unprejudiced jury. It is the duty of the court and the prosecuting attorney to see that this right is not denied. State v. Britt, 288 N.C. 699, 220 S.E. 2d 283 (1975);…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. RinckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.