Legal Opinion
International Harvester Co. of America v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 21, 1911PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from Logan Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Carroll
— Reversing.
This is a prosecution under the anti-trust laws of the State, and is the second appeal of the case. In the opinion on the former appeal, which may be found in 137 Ky., 668, it is said:
“The gist of the offense denounced by our statutes against pooling is that the purpose of the pool is to enhance the value of the article pooled above its real value. Where the design of the poolers is to so enhance the value of their product, or where, whatever their design, such is the natural effect of their action, and such as was necessarily foreseen because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Commonwealth v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Owen County Burley Tobacco Society v. BrumbackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Commonwealth v. GrinsteadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
- Cawein v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gathright v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Potter v. Dark Tobacco Growers Co-Operative Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Gay v. BrentCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Attorney General ex rel. James v. National Cash Register Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.