Legal Opinion
Potter v. Dark Tobacco Growers Co-Operative Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided December 21, 1923PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Clarke
Affirming.
Appellee was organized and incorporated nnder and pursuant to the provisions of chapter one of the 1922 Acts of the Kentucky General Assembly, which is known as the “Bingham Co-operative Marketing Act.” Appellant became a member of the association, and by written contract agreed to deliver to it his crops of tobacco for the years 1922 to 1926,-inclusive, as did 75 per cent, of the growers of dark tobacco in Kentucky, Indiana, and Tennessee.
Questioning the validity of the act and his contract, he was threatening and about to deliver his 1923 crop of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Marketing Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Workmen's Compensation Board v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- List v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Minnesota Wheat Growers Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. HugginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.