Legal Opinion
Richard Reahard Ann P. Reahard v. Lee County
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 14, 1992No. 91-3593PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Lee County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, appeals a magistrate judge’s order finding that the adoption of the Lee County Comprehensive Land Use Plan resulted in a taking of Appellees Richard and Ann Reahard’s property under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Because the magistrate judge misapplied the legal standard for partial takings and failed to make adequate factual findings, we VACATE the order and REMAND for new proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. BACKGROUND
This case concerns roughly forty acres…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Thomas Dodd Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Palazzolo v. State Ex Rel. TavaresSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Richard Reahard Ann P. Reahard v. Lee CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Corn v. City of Lauderdale LakesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.