Legal Opinion

Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 23, 1996No. 95-4351PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COX, Circuit Judge:

On this appeal, we address for the fourth time a 20-year-old dispute between Herman Corn and the City of Lauderdale Lakes, Florida (the “City”), over the City’s refusal to allow Com to build a mini-warehouse on his property. Corn alleges that the City’s actions effected a taking of his property entitling him to just compensation. The district court held that there was no taking of Corn’s property. We affirm in part, but must vacate and remand in part for the district court to make further factual findings.

I. FACTS 1

A The Property and Proposed Development

In 1966, Com…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Harbert International, Inc. v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. State ex rel. BSW Development Group v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. General Electric Co. v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. Villas of Lake Jackson, Ltd. v. Leon CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. State ex rel. BSW Dev. Group v. DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API