Legal Opinion

Ozark Poultry Products, Inc. v. Garman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1971No. 5-5647PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellant owns a rendering plant between Siloam Springs and Gentry. The .appellees — nine homeowners in the vicinity — brought this suit to abate the plant, as a nuisance polluting both the air and a natural stream. The chancellor found the plant to be a public nuisance and ordered it closed unless conditions at the plant were corrected within a reasonable time fixed by the court. For reversal the appellant argues a single point: The appellees were not entitled to a decree abating a public nuisance, because they failed to show that they have suffered special…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fisher v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Stoutemeyer v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Martin v. HornorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cox v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. Pottawattamie County v. Iowa Department of Environmental QualitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Peregrine Trading, LLC v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  4. City of Tulsa v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Pottawattamie Cty. v. IOWA DEPT., ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API