Ozark Poultry Products, Inc. v. Garman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The appellant owns a rendering plant between Siloam Springs and Gentry. The .appellees — nine homeowners in the vicinity — brought this suit to abate the plant, as a nuisance polluting both the air and a natural stream. The chancellor found the plant to be a public nuisance and ordered it closed unless conditions at the plant were corrected within a reasonable time fixed by the court. For reversal the appellant argues a single point: The appellees were not entitled to a decree abating a public nuisance, because they failed to show that they have suffered special…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fisher v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Stoutemeyer v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Martin v. HornorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cox v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Pottawattamie County v. Iowa Department of Environmental QualitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Peregrine Trading, LLC v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- City of Tulsa v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
- Pottawattamie Cty. v. IOWA DEPT., ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.