Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 14, 2003No. 01-CV-0900-EA(C)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EAGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs City of Tulsa and Tulsa Metropolitan Utility Authority (collectively, referred to as “Tulsa”) have filed suit against defendant City of Decatur, Arkansas (“Decatur”), a municipal corporation, and corporate defendants in the poultry industry (collectively referred to as “Poultry Defendants”) — Tyson Foods, Inc. (“Tyson”), Cobb-Vantress, Inc. (“Cobb-Vantress”), Peterson Farms, Inc. (“Peterson”), Simmons Foods, Inc. (“Simmons”), George’s, Inc. (“George’s”), and Cargill, Ine.(“Car-gill”). Tulsa alleges that the acts and omissions of defendants have polluted…
2Cases cited106 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- City of Wichita, Kansas v. Trustees of APCO Oil Corp. Liquidating TrustDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.