Legal Opinion

Woodruffe v. DeMola

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 30, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

146 N.J. Super. 51 (1976)

368 A.2d 967

DIAN WOODRUFFE (FORMERLY DIAN DeMOLA), PLAINTIFF,

v.

LOUIS JOSEPH DeMOLA, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided November 30, 1976.

Mr. George D. Whitmore, for plaintiff (Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Warren, attorneys).

Mr. James W. Broscious, for defendant (Messrs. Stover, Stover & Broscious, attorneys).

YACCARINO, J.S.C.

The genesis of this opinion is an issue which has been avoided on innumerable occasions by property settlements between divorcing parties and which, apparently, has never been addressed by our courts. Simply…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. Meeker v. MEEKERSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. Higginbotham v. HigginbothamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. Lawrence v. LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. Woliner v. WolinerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pierrakos v. PierrakosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API