Legal Opinion

Meeker v. MEEKER

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 3, 1968PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Goldmann, J.

(temporarily assigned). This appeal challenges the rule laid down in Floyd v. Floyd, 95 N. J. Eq. 661 (E. & A. 1924), and Morrissey v. Morrissey, N. J. 448 (1949), that our courts will not entertain a direct attack on the validity of a foreign divorce decree when, at the time the decree was rendered, neither spouse was a resident of this State.

Plaintiff, a bona fide resident of New Jersey, brought a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Division seeking to have her marital status clarified and her husband’s ex parte Mexican divorce…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. DeYoung v. DeYoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Ball v. . CrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Sherman v. Federal Security AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. Shapiro v. ShapiroNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Citibank v. Estate of SimpsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  2. Woliner v. WolinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Drobney v. DrobneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Wright v. WrightNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. Chaudry v. ChaudryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API