Legal Opinion

Woliner v. Woliner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 23, 1975PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed substantially for .the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Sohreiber and Judge Conford — 7.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Kazin v. KazinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Chaudry v. ChaudryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. Mendell v. MendellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Manfrini v. ManfriniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API