Legal Opinion

Pacific Power & Light v. Jacobson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 23, 1993No. 90-11363; CA A70655PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*262ROSSMAN, P. J.

Claimant has filed a petition for review of our opinion. 117 Or App 280, 844 P2d 223 (1992). We treat it as a petition for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, allow it, withdraw our opinion and affirm the Workers’ Compensation Board.

Claimant, a lineman representative, travels daily to various locations in his territory. He seeks benefits for an injury he sustained when he fell off a stool while eating his lunch at a restaurant. In a footnote to our opinion, we rejected claimant’s contention that he was a travelling employee, reasoning that the travelling employee rule is limited to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ReelOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Slaughter v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Pacific Power & Light v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bedwell v. Brandywine Carpet CleanersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1996
  2. Henderson v. S.D. Deacon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Proctor v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Sosnoski v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Saif Corp. v. ScardiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API