Pacific Power & Light v. Jacobson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*262ROSSMAN, P. J.
Claimant has filed a petition for review of our opinion. 117 Or App 280, 844 P2d 223 (1992). We treat it as a petition for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, allow it, withdraw our opinion and affirm the Workers’ Compensation Board.
Claimant, a lineman representative, travels daily to various locations in his territory. He seeks benefits for an injury he sustained when he fell off a stool while eating his lunch at a restaurant. In a footnote to our opinion, we rejected claimant’s contention that he was a travelling employee, reasoning that the travelling employee rule is limited to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ReelOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Slaughter v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Pacific Power & Light v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bedwell v. Brandywine Carpet CleanersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1996
- Henderson v. S.D. Deacon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Proctor v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Sosnoski v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Saif Corp. v. ScardiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.