Sosnoski v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order reversing an administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) order that set aside employer’s denial of compensability for claimant’s neck and low back injury. The issue is whether claimant, a traveling employee, was engaged in a distinct departure from his employment on a personal errand when he was injured in a motor vehicle accident. Because the relevant facts are not in dispute, we review for errors of law. ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(8); Proctor v. SAIF, 123 Or App 326, 860 P2d 828 (1993). We reverse the board and reinstate the AU’s order…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ReelOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Slaughter v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Hackney v. Tillamook Growers Co-Op.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Proctor v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ray Bell Construction Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Saif Corp. v. ScardiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- DEHIYA v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Ray Bell Construction Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Ray Bell Construction Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.