Saif Corp. v. Scardi
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (the board) reversing the order of an administrative law judge (ALJ) denying compensability. The issue is whether claimant was a traveling employee at the time of her injury and, if so, whether she was, nevertheless, “engaged in a distinct departure from [her] employment on a personal errand” at that time. Sosnoski v. SAIF, 184 Or App 88, 90, 55 P3d 533, rev den, 335 Or 114 (2002). We review the pertinent factual findings for substantial evidence and the legal conclusions for errors of law. ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(7),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Fred Meyer, Inc. v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ReelOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Slaughter v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Proctor v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sandberg v. JC PENNEY CO. INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- SAIF v. SumnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Davis v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Mendoza v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013