Legal Opinion
In re Taborsky
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided August 29, 1974No. Patent Appeal No. 9183PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to after reconsideration, which affirmed (with one examiner-in-chief dissenting) the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1 through 8 in appellant’s patent application serial No. 730,596, filed May 20, 1968,1 for “3-Nitrohalosal-icylanilides.” We reverse.
Claimed Subject Matter
3-Nitrohalosalicylanilides have the following general structural formula (numerals indicate ring positions):
In the above structural formula, the left-hand aromatic ring is called the “salicyl” ring and the right-hand…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In re LintnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Application of John R. StemniskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- In Re Jean Pierre Lalu and Louis FoulletierCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In re AlbrechtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- In re ShettyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In re AlbrechtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.