Legal Opinion

Parker v. . Thomas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 31, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

The dominant question of law presented is, whether or not the transaction constituted fraud in the factum or fraud in the treaty.

If the transaction constituted fraud in the factum, the note and the deed of trust held by the defendant bank is a nullity and void. If, upon the other hand, the evidence discloses only fraud in the treaty, the note and deed of trust would be voidable as between the original parties thereto, but binding in'the hands of a third person who was the innocent holder thereof. The rule is stated thus in Medlin v. Buford, 115 N. C., 260: “The first question to be considered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Nichols v. Champion Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Medlin v. . BufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Lanier v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. McArthur v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. CIT Corporation v. PanacCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Melton v. Family First Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Lanier v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API