Legal Opinion
Flatley v. Mauro
California Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 2006No. S128429PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
46 Cal.Rptr.3d 606 (2006)
39 Cal.4th 299
139 P.3d 2
Michael FLATLEY, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
D. Dean MAURO, Defendant and Appellant.
No. S128429.
Supreme Court of California.
July 27, 2006.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, James J.S. Holmes, Christina J. Imre, Douglas J. Collodel, Orly Degani, Los Angeles, and Wendy L. Wilcox for Defendant and Appellant.
Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman Machtinger & Kinsella, Bertram Fields and Ricardo P. Cestero, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Levy, Ram & Olson, Karl Olson, Erica L. Craven, San Francisco; Thomas W. Newton, Sacramento; Karlene W.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Montebello v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Rivera v. First Databank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- J-M Manufacturing Co. v. Phillips & Cohen LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Sprengel v. ZbylutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.