Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 10, 2008No. CR 06-1397PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul E. Danielson, Justice.

Appellant Mario Clark appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his petition pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37. He asserts two points on appeal: (1) that the circuit court erred in denying his Rule 37 petition because he was improperly convicted and sentenced for attempted capital murder, first-degree battery, and aggravated robbery, and (2) that his counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to make an objection as to whether the circuit court could enter convictions and sentences for all the charges. We hold that the circuit court did not clearly err and affirm…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Rowbottom v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Flores v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of West Virginia v. James WilkersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Norris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Burgie v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Gardner v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Van Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API