Bonnichsen v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JELDERKS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action seeking judicial review of a final agency decision that awarded the remains of the “Kennewick Man” to a coalition of Indian tribes and denied the Plaintiffs’ request to study those remains. Plaintiffs assert other claims based upon alleged statutory violations.
Plaintiffs seek to vacate the administrative decision which was made after an earlier decision was remanded to the agency for further proceedings. For the reasons set out below, I set aside the decision awarding the remains to the Tribal Claimants,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bonnichsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Center for Biological Diversity v. LohnDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2003
- Bonnichsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Okinawa Dugong v. MattisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Hazard Coal Corporation v. American Resources CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.