Legal Opinion

Okinawa Dugong v. Mattis

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 1, 2018No. Case No. 03-cv-04350-EMCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge

This case concerns the planned Futenma Replacement Facility (FRF), a U.S. military facility in Okinawa, and its potential impacts on the Okinawa dugong, an endangered sea mammal important in Japanese culture. Negotiations between the United States and Japanese governments regarding the FRF have a long and fraught history. As explained in more detail below, they ultimately resulted in an agreement to relocate the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma from Ginawan City to an area adjacent to Camp Schwab and the Oura and Henoko Bays.

In 2003, Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Northwest Motorcycle Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Northern Plains Resource Council, Inc. v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Environmental Protection Information Center v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Center for Bio. Diversity v. Mark EsperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API