Legal Opinion

Gerhart Et Ux. v. Hilsenbeck

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1948No. Appeal, 96PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Plaintiffs sued in equity to compel defendants, who are owners and their tenant, to remove obstructions from an alley in the rear of their respective properties. The chancellor found for plaintiffs, and defendants’ exceptions were dismissed by the court en banc.

Plaintiffs secured title to No. 6316 Norwood Street, Philadelphia, by a deed dated July 22,1942. It describes premises fronting on Norwood Street 14 feet 6 inches wide and extending 87 feet “to a certain three feet wide alley, which leads Southwardly and into another three feet wide alley, which leads Eastwardly into…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stark Et Ux. v. Lardin, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Scheetz v. FitzwaterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
  3. Masters v. Local No. 472, U.M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Nickels v. Hand in Hand Cornet BandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Shaffer v. LauriaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Plauchak v. BolingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Baylor v. SoskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Wittig v. CarlacciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Zeglin v. GahagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Glenn v. ShueySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API