Legal Opinion
Bell v. Jewel Food Store
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 22, 2000No. 98 C 6686PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant Jewel Food Stores’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). For the following reasons the court grants the motion.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Plaintiff Maurice Bell (“Bell”) is an African-American man who was employed by defendant Jewel Food Stores (“Jewel”) from 1992 until March of 1998. Jewel owns and operates retail grocery stores in the Chicago area. Bell brought this suit against Jewel under (1) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq.; (2)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Donald C. Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reinwald v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- De Hoyos v. Bristol Laboratories Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Beverly v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Ware v. North Shore Placement Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023