State ex rel. C.S. v. Dowd
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRANE, Chief Judge.
Relator, defendant in the underlying battery action, seeks a writ of prohibition prohibiting respondent from enforcing his order requiring relator to be physically examined under Rule 60.01(a) to determine if and when he was circumcised. We issued a preliminary order in prohibition and we now make our preliminary order absolute.
J.C., plaintiff in the underlying action, filed an action against relator for damages for battery. In her second amended petition, she alleged that relator had non-eonsensual sexual intercourse with her sometime between November 23, 1992 and November…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- James J. Acosta, Sr. v. Tenneco Oil Company and Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Martin v. YeohamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
- Adler v. EwingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Geiger v. BowersoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Doe v. SenechalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Stockmann v. FrankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Doe v. West Lake AcademyMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
- Ray v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.