Legal Opinion

People v. Frankie J.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1988No. G004909PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.

Frankie J. contends a condition of probation prohibiting his possession of weapons of any description was improper. He alleges the condition was unrelated to the facts of his case or his background. He also asserts the court, and not the probation officer, should have selected the terms and conditions of probation.

I

On January 4, 1985, two male assailants severely beat, raped, and sodomized Carolyn L. They also forced her to orally copulate them. A petition charging appellant with these crimes was filed January 14. The juvenile court, on April 16, found appellant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Kearl v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. In Re MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. Todd L.California Court of Appeal · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. Tyrell J.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. Ricardo P. (In Re Ricardo P.)California Supreme Court · 2019
  3. People v. Laylah K.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. People v. Binh L.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. Michael D.California Court of Appeal · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API