Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Laylah K.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1991No. Docket Nos. G009026, G009027PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.

After being declared wards of the juvenile court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602), sisters Laylah K. and Sombrah K. were placed on probation and ordered to comply with certain terms and conditions. On appeal, they challenge the imposition of those terms, arguing they bear no reasonable relationship to the offenses and to their social histories.

I

On April 27, 1989, Laylah, Sombrah, and two other girls accosted a woman walking her dog along a street. Demanding to know why she was wearing an article of red clothing, they shouted obscenities and challenged her to fight.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. Todd L.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. People v. Michael D.California Court of Appeal · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. Tyrell J.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Los Angeles County Department of Children's Services v. Gregory C.California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. E.O.California Court of Appeal · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API