Legal Opinion
People v. Binh L.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 1992No. H008329PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.
Binh L., a minor, was required by the terms of a preexisting juvenile probation order to submit to warrantless search. A police officer, acting in apparent good faith but with neither probable cause nor knowledge of the preexisting probation search condition, searched the minor’s person and found incriminating evidence. Should the evidence have been suppressed? We conclude that in the circumstances of record the answer is no. Our conclusion is consistent with that in In re Marcellus L. (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 134 [279 Cal.Rptr. 901], but our analysis differs from…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. Tyrell J.California Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. Erica R.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. RiosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Abdirahman S.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Myers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.