Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hill v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1999No. CV-97-0409-PRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Vice Chief Justice.

Facts and Procedural History

¶ 1 The plaintiff, Fondia Hill, brings this civil action against the City of Phoenix and City of Phoenix Police Department (the City), and Maricopa County, Maricopa County Attorney’s Office and Anthony Stedino (the County) alleging that defendants wrongfully investigated, arrested, incarcerated and prosecuted him. Specifically, plaintiff alleges federal civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as state law claims of assault and battery, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress and defamation.

¶…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hanen v. WillisArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Flagstaff Vending Co. v. City of FlagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Boydston v. Strole Development Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Creach v. AnguloArizona Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. National Broker Associates, Inc. v. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. Mahar v. Acuna, IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API