Legal Opinion

DiLuchio v. Otis Oil Burner Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 3, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The bill states no ground upon which this court would be justified in interfering with the judgment at law. So far as the bill’s allegations disclose, the complainant as defendant in the lawsuit could have set up every fact by way of defense in that suit which he now urges in this court as grounds of attack upon the judgment. There is nothing alleged here inconsistent with the idea that what the complainant desires is in substance a retrial of issues which the law- court had ample jurisdiction to settle. For all that appears, those very issues were, or could have been, raised…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hudson v. LaytonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1919
  2. Kersey v. RashCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1869
  3. Kuratle v. PyleCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gray Co. v. Alemite Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  2. Pefkaros v. HarmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  3. Arcturus Radio Tube Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API