Legal Opinion

Gray Co. v. Alemite Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 13, 1934PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

This suit is concerned with a con- > troversy arising out of certain agreements between the complainant (herein referred to as Gray) and the defendant (herein referred to as Al emite) touching license rights under patents to manufacture and- sell lubricating equipment. The bill also sets up a ground of complaint against the defendant of unfair competition in trade and trade libel and slander in violation of the agreements above mentioned.

Prior to 1932 Gray and Alemite were engaged in competition as manufacturers and vendors of lubricating equipment under patents and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Connecticut v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Godwin v. CollinsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1868
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  4. Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  5. Todd v. Diamond State Iron Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Wife, B. T. L. v. Husband, H. A. L.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1972
  3. Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
  4. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. Lummus CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1968
  5. McQuail v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API