Arcturus Radio Tube Co. v. Radio Corp. of America
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor :
Before the hearing of testimony in this case was commenced, I raised the question of the court’s jurisdiction. The defendant declined and has since declined to notice the query. Of course the complainant considers the jurisdiction exists. I have concluded that it does not.
1. The first ground on which the complainant relies as sufficient to support the jurisdiction is that of reformation of the contract. It is not pretended that the clause which the complainant seeks to eliminate from the contract is present therein as a result of fraud or mistake. Of course there is no…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wilson v. PowersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Southern Street Railway Advertising Co. v. Metropole Shoe Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Gray Co. v. Alemite Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
- Pefkaros v. HarmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jefferson Chemical Co. v. Mobay Chemical Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1969
- Gracelawn Memorial Park, Inc. v. Eastern Memorial Consultants, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1971