Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Yeamans Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1936No. 32,685PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This'is an appeal by respondent and its insurance carrier from a judgment rendered in a compensation case, affirming the award granted the widow of a deceased night watchman who was killed while crossing a street which ran in front of the property he was watching for the respondent.

There is no question about his being an employee of the respondent at the time he was killed, nor that he was working under dual employment and not joint employment, the other employer not being a party to the action.

The appellants present the questions…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Fair v. Golden Rule Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Haas v. Kansas City Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Kennedy v. Hull & Dillon Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. American National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  2. Pearson v. Electric Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Abbott v. Southwest Grain Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Thorp v. Victory Cab Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Evans v. Western Terra Cotta Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API