Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilkins

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided November 16, 2012No. 11-0486/NAPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge STUCKY

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We granted review in this case to determine whether Appellant’s right to due process of law was violated when he was convicted for abusive sexual contact as a lesser included offense (LIO) of aggravated sexual assault. We hold that abusive sexual contact is not an LIO of aggravated sexual assault in this case, but Appellant was not prejudiced by the error. We therefore affirm the judgment of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA).

I

Contrary to Appellant’s pleas, members found him guilty in a general court-martial of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. TunstallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  2. United States v. McClourCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  3. United States v. GaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  4. United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  5. United States v. RigginsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API