Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Tunstall

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 23, 2013No. 12-0516/AFPublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN

delivered the opinion of the court.

Airman First Class (A1C) Michael Tunstall was charged with two specifications of aggravated sexual assault and one specification each of adultery and false official statement, in violation of Articles 120, 134, and 107, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 934, 907 (2006). He pled not guilty to all charges and at a general court-martial with members was convicted of one specification of aggravated sexual assault and the adultery specification. He was found not guilty of the false official statement specification and the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. United States v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  2. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  3. United States v. McClourCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  4. United States v. GaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  5. United States v. RigginsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API