Legal Opinion
United States v. Curtiss Aeroplane Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 27, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
The complaint alleges seven causes of action. Each is based upon the alleged breach of a separate contract of sale of Curtiss aeroplanes by defendant to the Imperial Russian Government. The United States sues as assignee under the Litvinoff Assignment of November 16, 1933. The contracts were all made in 1914 and 1915. The latest delivery date specified in any of the contracts was July 20, 1915. Action was commenced on April 9, 1941.
Defendant has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, on the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Stoner v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Steingut v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Gonzales v. TuttmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- In re the Arbitration between General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. & CerrettoNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Keesing v. WishnefskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943