Legal Opinion

Steingut v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 15, 1944PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

On December 27, 1917, Russo-Asiatic Bank, a Russian corporation, had a credit balance with the defendant, Guaranty Trust Company, in New York, of $1,484,156.94. The plaintiffs in the equity action lay claim thereto as receivers of the assets in New York of the Russian Bank, appointed under § 977-b of the New York Civil Practice Act. The United States, as plaintiff in the two law actions, lays claim to the same balance as successor in interest to Soviet Russia, by virtue of the Litvinov Assignment of November 16, 1933.

Defendant Guaranty resists both claims as well as…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carl Marks & Co. v. Union of Soviet Socialist RepublicsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. United States v. Ernest Tippett, United States of America v. Charles Ellis WillisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  3. Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. New York Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API