Legal Opinion
Gonzales v. Tuttman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1945PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
Motion by the defendants Louis Tuttman and Leonard Tuttman for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, on the grounds that the plaintiff’s alleged causes of action are barred by the statute of limitations of New York, § 13, Civil Practice Act, and by various sections of the Civil Code of Puerto Rico and the Code of Civil Procedure of Puerto Rico.
This action was commenced in this court by the filing of the complaint on May 19, 1944. The defendants Louis Tuttman and Leonard Tuttman have appeared by their…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sam J. Hire v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Mike Sherman v. Fredric D. Kirshman, and Richard King, Joseph Rashti and Robert Adler, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Erickson v. SaidDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Swick v. Glenn L. Martin Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1946
- Cornacchio v. ConiglioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.